The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Scrapes past the notability guidelines for bands. ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 13:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Courteeners[edit]

The Courteeners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

They apparently have a pretty good PR machine, but this band hasn't released an album or toured yet. Fails notability. Corvus cornix 20:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete They might be notable one day, but they aren't yet. Reads like the PR it almost certainly is.Alberon 12:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - issues with the article sounding like a PR piece can be dealth with. Tagged with ((POV)). -- Whpq 15:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - article provides two sources, and searching trough Google News shows a lot of hits. Many of these articles (for example this one) have the band as the focus of the article. It looks like they've made it past "up-and-coming" to "newly-arrived". Meets WP:BIO with multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. -- Whpq 15:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Reads like an advert and needs to be toned down a bit but subject of article appears to be notable - major label single released, several secondary sources, supported a definitely notable band, et cetera. 91.106.28.172 18:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC) (Sorry that was A1Octopus who had forgotten to sign in.)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.