The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty■ 00:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Dark Avengers - film[edit]

NN independent film. "The film opened theaters in Dallas on July 22nd, 2005 to a generally receptive crowd and moderate acclaim." The flier on the myspace page of the "actor/director/composer/editor" shows that those "theaters" are actually a single small Dallas art gallery. Despite an IMDB entry, the film gets only 40 Ghits and not one review on Rotten Tomatoes. - Rynne 05:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, couldn't outsmart us. Yet another entry that I beat in google hits. Grandmasterka 05:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, yet another example of where IMDb proves unreliable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn film. IMO, it is ok to use a lack of IMDB as a reason to delete, much more rarely as a reason to keep. JoshuaZ 06:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, 40 Ghits ain't gonna get it for a film. Also agree with JoshuaZ's IMDb analysis --Deville (Talk) 14:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. MikeWazowski 16:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn film, 40 Google hits is definitely proved to be nn despite an IMDB profile. --Terence Ong 16:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the flyer shown is just from the premiere showing. But deletion is understandable in this case.

-Brandon

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.