The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Dizzy Acrobat[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Woody Woodpecker filmography, not notable Indagate (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Indagate (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since when are Academy Awards nominees not notable? DonaldD23 talk to me 19:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 16:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the suggested article features a mix of links - some of the cartoons are standalone, others are circular links to the filmography article (which should probably be fixed). As an Academy Award nominee, this one is probably notable enough to have a standalone article. Keep Tony Fox (arf!) 18:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, despite the current state of the article, the topic is notable having received an Oscar nom. BOVINEBOY2008 08:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.