The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 14:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Expulsion of the Albanians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by blocked sock-master, article is questionable and highly POV, and it should be deleted Axiomus (talk) 12:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Users are willing to work on the article, as per talk.--Zoupan 12:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 13:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 13:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 13:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - An article created by a Sockmaster is not a valid reason for deletion. Claiming an article is POV is also not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be a case of WP:IDL. This is a valid notable article which is referenced appropriately. IJA (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the technical grounds that the nominator has failed to give a valid reason for deletion. Fiachra10003 (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as per rationale given above. Perhaps, the nominator might also check the talk page first.--Mondiad (talk) 18:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - Yeah it's pretty stupid to nominate every single article created by AH..., Anyway I'm not seeing any beneficial advantages to deleting the article .... Plus it meets GNG anyway.... –Davey2010^Talk 20:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zoupan. Discussions on the talk page indicate that editors have expressed a willingness to improve this article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets gng, so the creation by sock is just rationale seems to be a revenge vendetta rather than a rational argument for deletion. Jacona (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.