The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Oswald the Lucky Rabbit filmography#1931. $Salvio giuliano$ 08:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Fisherman (1931 film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I redirected this 7 minute film to Oswald the Lucky Rabbit filmography#1931, but was reverted. Nothing but an extremely excessive plot summary, not enough evidence of notability found to warrant a stand-alone article. Fram (talk) 08:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Fram (talk) 08:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Delete Although I am wracked with guilt at depriving the world of "A fish is making a serenade for the worm and a giant fish appears and the fish runs away and the worm was still standing still, the giant fish thought it ate the worm but it escaped and the giant fish swam forward." and other timeless prose. ChatGPT summarise a cartoon plot, please. Fails WP:GNG, per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect back to Oswald the Lucky Rabbit filmography#1931. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Oswald the Lucky Rabbit filmography#1931 - not enough in-depth coverage for a standalone article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.