The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Frog King (film)[edit]

Apparently fails WP:NFF. No prejudice towards recreation when verification of the shoot commencing can be provided. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article doesn't cite any sources at all, but from a search on Google, there are reliable sources such as this that exist and prove at least a bit of notability. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend you read NFF - it explicitly fails the standards for film notability. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shereth 22:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NFF. Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.