The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yet to be released (or possibly even made) film by non-notable person. No referencing given, and I have found nothing myself. Peridon (talk) 19:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Forgot to say above that prod was declined by the author, and the above was my reason for prod, which still seems to hold good so far as I can see. Peridon (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - WP:SPAM or WP:CRYSTAL? There is nothing in reliable sources about this almost single-man project that doesn't have an air date yet - ManicSpider (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know, I appreciate it. - ManicSpider (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per waaaaay WP:TOOSOON. If the project ever begins and gets itself some coverage, then an undeletion might be considered. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 05:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've just looked through the character list added to the article. Oh dear. Three Field Marshals. It is not a common rank in British military history and currently in disuse, but "The United States has never used the rank of field marshal" (quoted from the Wikipedia article Field Marshal, and one of them is a KBE to boot. According to KBE, "Several past American statesmen and diplomats who have performed service for, or on behalf of, the United Kingdom" have received an honorary KBE. Was this 'Field Marshall' also a diplomat? Which part of the Vietnam conflict was he in? At its commencement he would have been about 55, at its end 75. (The same applies to Lieutenant Arthur Anderson who fought in both World Wars - but there is no mention for either of Korea; perhaps they had a break.) For an FM, 55+ is acceptable - for a Lieutenant it is pushing things somewhat even in a desk position. Peridon (talk) 12:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article has far greater problems than the creative licenses taken by the filmmaker... Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 05:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.