The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 04:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Greatest Show on Turf[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It should be merged to the History of the St. Louis Rams article because I feel it is not notable enough for its own article. Grand Armor (talk) 05:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable enough to still be discussed 16 years later (Baskin, Ben (May 23, 2017). "How Mike Martz and The Greatest Show on Turf kicked off an NFL revolution". Sports Illustrated. ((cite web)): Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)). If it referred to one season than a redirect would warrant, but since it is three specific seasons, that won't work. Of the group nicknames from Category:Nicknamed groups of sportspeople, I feel this one is definitely one that should stay. WikiVirusC^(talk) 15:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article discusses three-years of football. There are plenty of sources available on the internet that offer in-depth commentary, including Encyclopedia Britannica, FiveThirtyEight, ESPN to name a few. The article already discusses Faulk, Bruce, Warner, and Holt along with Mike Martz's ideology and impact on the game. The article needs work for sure, but I feel there a plenty of RS to establish notability of and offer substainlal commentary on the Rams during this era. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 03:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep permit me to echo the above editors who note that the needed sources exist. Lepricavark (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.