The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - meets the usual notability standards (i. e. WP:N). I see no reason to make an exception in this case. WilyD 13:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found by Gibb. And i'm wondering why this was even relisted. seems we have a consensus. Umbralcorax (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Relisted because notability might be affected by the outcome of this nomination. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.