The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Steel 00:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Institute of Brand Science[edit]

First, brand "science" is not actually science as such. Second, this article has zero independent sources. Third, the organisation is a small group within a university business school - my university department had half a dozen units like this. Fourth, the article reads as a press release, and includes some truly appalling management consultant bullshit. Guy (Help!) 15:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - a previous incarnation of this article was listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zyman Institute of Brand Science. --Muchness 16:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect without merge to Goizueta Business School. Reads like a press release; no independent sources to establish notability. --Muchness 16:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, non notable, advertisement. — coelacan talk — 04:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "The Institute of Brand Science" is a cut-and-paste page-move copy of Zyman Institute of Brand Science. Although the new title is correct, the move method was not. Note that extensive discussion still exists at Talk:Zyman_Institute_of_Brand_Science. Fourohfour 14:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As the nominator notes, there are many such units in many universities. What makes this one notable ? The article doesn't say. Delete. WMMartin 18:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.