The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Jacksons TV Performances 1977[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced affair, not enough for a stand alone article. The Banner talk 20:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced and WP:NOTTVGUIDE, especially with something that can't even be used by anyone that doesn't have a time machine. Nate • (chatter) 04:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Routine, run-of-the-mill performances. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Even if this information was appropriate for an encyclopedia, it's unclear why the group's performances in each year should be broken out into a separate article rather than including all years in one article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT and unnecessary. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.