The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Liquidator (2017 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. No citations. Even imdb does not list this film. Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because ~~contrary to Onel5969's odd claim,~~ there were citations before they put the article up for deletion. Furthermore, film has been covered here and here. All this seems to establish interest in an upcoming film and demonstrates notability. Lack of IMDb page does not necessarily mean anything, especially considering that IMDb is English-language and may focus a lot more on Western films. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, actually, the correct difference would be this one, prior to the article's creator removing the original AfD tag. But thanks for pointing out the brief mentions you link to in the references above. Take care.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies! I've struck out that part. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just to note that plenty of upcoming non English-language films do not have pages on IMDB. There were several films competing in the main section of the last Berlin Film Festival that did not have an IMDB page until after the festival. IMDB is essentially a wiki, with editors on that site waiting for their own reliable sources (press releases, etc), before adding a new title to their database. Hope that helps. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be in post-production. Definitely notable, several bankable actors + popular novel adaptation = likely box office success. Timmyshin (talk) 07:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.