The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, content was copy and pasted from website.--Otterathome (talk) 21:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Midnight Palace[edit]

The Midnight Palace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

My first instinct was to nominate for speedy deletion per CSD:A7. Judging from the quotes offered and the awards stated on their page, though, makes me wonder. I'm listing for AfD to get some more eyes on it. If kept, it needs a lot of NPOV rephrasing. Plvekamp (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - reads like an advert, there are no sources and the fact that a huge chunk of the main paragraph comes under the heading "The site as described on its "About Us" page:" leads me to believe it's a big WP:COPYVIO! -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 14:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. Agree w/ JediLofty (talk · contribs) about the blatant copyvio issues. Cirt (talk) 17:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find anything in news sources to indicate notability. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 07:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.