The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep bad faith nomination. `'mikkanarxi 09:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Mischief Makers[edit]

{:The Mischief Makers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Non-notable group. Carl Timothy Jones 22:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I argue that this is a notable group. See the extensive history of the project. Please see related issue: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#A_coincidence_.3F. WietsE 23:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• What are the details of your argument? Apart from accusing me of bad faith. Carl Timothy Jones 23:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I see no evidence that they have been primary subject of multiple on-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Guy (Help!) 00:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Cbrown1023 00:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per nominator's WP:SPA (and indef blocking) and the article seems to be more notable than previously thought. Cbrown1023 02:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP Overall I found it to be good article, thank you for your time. Rcehoppe 08:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.