The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Mods[edit]

The Mods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This band fails WP:BAND. Google News archives is not yielding significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The sole reference in the article is from a blog. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Seems to lack sufficient significance to justify an encyclopedia article, let alone sources on which to base one. --Michig (talk) 19:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No releases, no significant third-party coverage, etc. Fails WP:BAND badly. §FreeRangeFrog 20:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not Notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.