The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force characters. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mooninites[edit]

The Mooninites (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Plutonians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Wholly non-notable content lacking citations to reliable third-party sources. Single editor with eerily similar interest to banned editor also tendentious about ATHF reverting redirect. --EEMIV (talk) 19:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mooninites article should be redirected. It doesn't have enough information. Careymeans 1:22, 10 April 2010

I do like this show, but why can't this just be part of the aqua teen article. no sense in it being different. PvsKllKsVp (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Careymeans 2:46, 10 April 2010

• Redirect & Merge to List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force characters --Cybercobra (talk) 00:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I oppose a merge. This characters of fleeting importance within the series are sufficiently covered at List_of_Aqua_Teen_Hunger_Force_characters#The_Mooninites. --EEMIV (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't see the problem. It's not like much would be merged anyway after removing redundancy. --Cybercobra (talk) 18:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• comment wouldn't the whole hoopla in Boston a few years back help push these guys over the edge into independent notability? I'm asking, because I'm really not sure.Umbralcorax (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The incident (2007 Boston bomb scare) was notable, don't think it really made the characters notable. --Cybercobra (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect if the content is already covered in the list article. No particular reason to delete this content before redirecting--It's not obvious to me that the redirect was tried and reverted before sending this here. Jclemens (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Related AfD here; Mooninites has been a long-standing redirect to replace similar cruft. Same pattern of obnoxious restoration. (One of the two editors of this more recent iteration was just blocked as a a longtime sockmaster.) So, no, this article hasn't had a lot of "let's try a redirect first" but the topic has. --EEMIV (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per above. I redirected this article shortly after creation but its author must have undone that. ThemFromSpace 20:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.