The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 05:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Official Visit[edit]

The Official Visit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOT#PLOT, and doesn't establish WP:Notability; a plot summary is already present in List of Yes Minister and Yes, Prime Minister episodes. I originally added a ((notability)) flag in 2008, which got removed in 2012 for no apparent reason. (This AfD is a test case for all the other episodes for this series.) – sgeureka tc 09:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka tc 09:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I am fine with redirecting all of them to the LoE, and interested editors can salvage what they want from the ep article history. However, I do not support leaving the articles up for longer - eleven years have been long enough. – sgeureka tc 11:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's exactly what List of Yes Minister and Yes, Prime Minister episodes is already doing. The plot summaries are already fine and per WP:UNDUE don't need more than one or two summary sentences extra, which you won't find in the ep articles. A plot reminder from e.g. IMDb can help here as well, so it's not like deletion would hurt. – sgeureka tc 10:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Those are just one line summaries - way too short. We want the main article to look like this: Chernobyl (miniseries). This content of this article (and all others in the series) should be written down into a 10-line summary per Chernobyl; otherwise, I would not delete the article. Britishfinance (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I can certainly respect that an editor put work into this article, but that is not really a good reason to keep something. The final part falls under WP:OTHERSTUFF. Some shows have episodes that received enough coverage for individual articles, while others do not have this. Such comparisons are not particularly useful for this particular discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.