The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bmusician 06:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Basically an advert for a venue of dubious notability. Orange Mike | Talk 22:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: 1828 structure, coverage seems to establish notability of the structure per WP:GNG.--Milowent • hasspoken 02:16, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with some edit repurposing towards being about the building throughout its history with a subsection on its current usage, rather than the other way about. AllyD (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like a tourist advertisement, including an external link to the city's tourism site[1] Looks like any old building in any city. Nothing to satisfy WP:Notability. Iglooflame (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Basically a historical building which is nearly 200 years old and documented in numerous reliable sources during those two centuries. Warden (talk) 21:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Even if it were only a venue for performances, it would probably be notable, but as a former market hall and a historic huilding it is addtionally notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a major venue in Hove, and an architecturally and historically significant building.--A bit iffy (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.