The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Redeeming[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability, nor does it meet notability for films. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; maybe the film will be notable once it is out, (though I doubt it considering none of its directors or cast already have articles), but as of now it is not. It should also be noted that the article was created by the film's production company Osmium Films. Opencooper (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Opencooper[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Opencooper (talk) 07:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Opencooper (talk) 07:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

alts:

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

location:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now per failing WP:NF. While I have no doubt that the project has completed filming and is in post-production, its production lacking coverage in reliable sources has it fail WP:NFF (paragraph 3), thus making this one simply TOO SOON. The article can be resurrected upon release AND upon the film receiving independent coverage. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 15:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no actual release date established, nothing yet convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.