The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. StarM 04:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable no-band. Damiens.rf 18:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete, possibly speedy. A quick google search showed a number of bands, none of which seemed to be this band, other than Wikipedia hits. Seems to fail notability entirely. Theseeker4 (talk) 19:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that this article appears to have had attention from multiple users over a period of two years makes me suspect the band may be more notable than this article suggests. Difficult to tell with Google because of two other bands that have the same name. However, until either someone asserts notability or gives a good reason why this band can be presumed notable, Weak Delete. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.