The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is to turf stroke and delete (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:53, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Thornbury Turf Strokers[edit]

The Thornbury Turf Strokers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor club only; does not meet notability criteria. Brian (talk) 08:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete absolutely no notability nor much chance of any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The-Pope (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Pope. extra999 (talk) 09:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete—As per above. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 16:45, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per all the above. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 16:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.