The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Brandon (talk) 08:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Top Ten Weird Dismissals Of Cricket[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there are a lot of Google hits, there appears to be no coverage outside of blogs and forums. Therefore, no coverage by reliable sources, and meets no other criteria of WP:WEB. Singularity42 (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Something Created While On Break From School One Day. DarkAudit (talk) 00:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete: Fails WP:WEB. Joe Chill (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't significant coverage of the video. Jujutacular ^T · C 08:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 08:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 08:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Utterly hopeless case. --Cybercobra (talk) 10:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable Youtube video. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 18:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Johnlp (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.