The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 21:52, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Underground HK[edit]

The Underground HK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot tell whether or not they are notable. I can however tell that this is an advertisement, complete with a list of all the local acts that have played there. DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - can't find any reliable sources. Deb (talk) 07:07, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Reserving judgement for now until I've looked into it more to determine notability. I'm leaning in the direction of keep. Mainly, because the existing bulleted bibliography-style refs, South China Morning Post, Time Out etc, at first glance appear to give non-trivial coverage. All that said, I'm in general agreement with DGG's advertisement point. Without the encouraging—if underused—bulleted refs, I very probably would've plumped for deletion (WP:TNT). -- 91.125.29.135 (talk) 23:25, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A word on sources: the Googlenews links above aren't all that useful as seemingly some of the publications mentioned above don't have fulltext articles indexed; also, the trailing HK is often omitted by Hong Kong sources. Scans of some of the org's coverage is on their Press page. -- 91.125.29.135, 23:25, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable club. No significant coverage found in reliable sources.  Philg88 ^♦talk 04:00, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.