The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Wild Stallion[edit]

The Wild Stallion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing in Newspapers.com. I did find a review from the Dove Foundation. Needs one more suitable and reliable review to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• The Radio Times gave it two stars, but it's more of a summary than a review. Certes (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  The Radio Times link is a capsule review and capsule reviews are insufficient enough to fully establish notability per WP:NFSOURCES. The Film Creator (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment One from the Deseret News, [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  That is a newspaper listing, which also considered insufficient enough to fully establish notability per NFSOURCES. The Film Creator (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep In addition to the Dove review you found, there is one from CineMagazine cited in the article. CineMagazine is an acceptable source and is used in hundreds of Wikipedia film articles. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Oh my goodness! I completely didn’t realize the Cinemagazine source in the article. I therefore speedy withdraw this nomination per NEXIST since there are reviews from Cinemagazine and Dove. My humble apologies. The Film Creator (talk) 04:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.