The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted by MBisanz. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The designer[edit]

The designer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:FILM and the only reference provided doesn't specify any details establishing the film's notability. The article's creator has removed any improvement tags without making any changes to the article. Dan arndt (talk) 10:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Dan arndt (talk) 10:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FILM. KGirlTrucker87 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 10:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there's nothing currently suggesting better for the applicable notability, unless any actual local coverage that is substantial can be found. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  08:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.