The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid 64 15:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pendragon[edit]

An IP editor, who is also removing valid "article for deletion" templates, restoring copyvio material to articles, and leaving unsigned criticism on my talk page, has removed the "notability" template from this article several times without adding any information about notability to the article. This subject is an "internet novel." A stab at notability is made by asserting that the novel was recently reviewed, but I don't see that even that helps this come close to WP:N janejellyroll 23:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IP editor (who has apparently been blocked) aside, don't see any reason why this is notable-even one review being the case, notability requires multiple non-trivial source mentions, enough to write a comprehensive article on the subject. Seraphimblade 23:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - 71.232.29.141 02:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete easily. Block the IP as a sock of that one guy who inserts copyvios and removes AFD debates.. forgot his name. -- Chris is me _(u/c/t) 05:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Wikipedia is not a directory of every novel ever written. Goochelaar 09:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, specifically per Goochelaar's comment. WMMartin 14:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.