The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete, no evidence of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. I was this close to tagging this for speedy deletion when I saw it on the new pages list, but then I thought people would jump down my throat since this subject is covered here, here, I think here, a five-minute news report you can watch here, and 504,997 other Google hits I don't feel like looking through. On the other hand, (1) this is stupid, and (2) WP:FRINGE. It's particularly troublesome that this article already presents unsourced claims like "[a]lmost all participants say Theta healing has had a positive effect," when two of the top five Google autocomplete options for "theta healing" are "theta healing scam" and "theta healing fraud." Glenfarclas (talk) 00:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability. Drmies (talk) 04:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It would be possible to write a valid article about "theta healing" based on this source, but the current article has no useful content. It should be deleted unless at least a valid stub is put there. Looie496 (talk) 14:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.