The result was delete. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
lots of namedropping, inhouse publishing and vagueness, but the 4 tags at the top suggest nn. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert D. Parker, as Alansohn says "The article has a lot of stuff, much of which comes across as a very thorough search of media mentions, almost all trivial. There's nothing here to support a claim of notability and nothing further found in a Google search." Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)