The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of major beauty pageants[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo vehicle only based on related sources (not conform WP:RS) The Banner talk 09:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The whole article was copied from pageantcenter.com. Also, the website is not WP:RS. --Richie Campbell (talk) 03:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable topic and is this copyvio? Legacypac (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not quite a copyvio, but is replicating the style and some of the information. We really need another source to show this presentation amounts to a notable topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.