- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Todd Daniel[edit]
- Todd Daniel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Fuddle (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fuddle (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a non-notable academic. Not everyone who creates a Youtube channel becomes notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I found and added a reliable secondary source about his podcast, and corrected his description to say that he's a psychology instructor rather than a professor based on some less-independent sources from his employer. But that's still well below what we need for WP:GNG, and with Google scholar listing three publications for Todd E. Daniel with citation counts 4, 1, 0, WP:PROF seems far out of reach. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.