The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Woolard[edit]

Tom Woolard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ATH and WP:GNG - no evidence of having played in fully professional league Steve-Ho (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. Fails inclusion criteria for athletes (WP:ATH) and the general inclusion criteria (WP:N). --217.43.246.210 (talk) 18:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:00, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails ATHLETE having not played at required level, fails GNG with no in depth coverage, merely passing mention in routine sports coverage--ClubOranje^T 10:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.