- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 03:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Cargill[edit]
- Tony Cargill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Single credible reference. Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines. Onel5969 (talk) 03:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Found plenty of sources with a Google search. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - How can one say Found plenty of sources with a Google search yet not list one single source here ... WP:ILIKEIT ins't a valid reason to keep an article, Anyway I on the other hand haven't found anything except Facebook crap so per nom fails GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 04:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject of the article obviously fails WP:GNG. I can't find the significant coverages to Reliable sources that established the subject notability. Wikicology (talk) 08:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
-
- @Mr. Guye, that is not a reliable source by any stretch of the definition... czar ⨹ 03:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability, either as a footballer or a dancer. Fails GNG. GiantSnowman 16:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.