The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non admin closure). Qst 16:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Chapman[edit]

Is this person really worth a stand-alone biography? You tell me. I have my doubts. WP:BLP1E applies here. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 22:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — It may be debatable and borderline, but it could be argued that anyone who has been a member of what subsequently became one of the greatest Rock and Roll bands in the world (The Rolling Stones — arguably the greatest) is part of an important musical history. The information in this article should certainly be somewhere on Wikipedia rather than just being summarily deleted. In any case, Tony Chapman appeared more that once with the Rolling Stones as a member of the band, so I think that WP:BLP1E, which applies to a single event, is not applicable here. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I really like the Stones too, but I'm not going to let that POV (WP:BIAS) creep into this otherwise non-notable biography.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 23:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I detest their music, but he's notable enough for a stub (anything longer would be tedious). --Paularblaster (talk) 01:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jonathan Bowen and Paularblaster. jj137 ♠ Talk 00:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Victuallers (talk) 11:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.