The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Denman[edit]

It has been tagged for cleanup and tagged for having no references at all since June 2007. There has been no effort to rectify this as far as I can see. The page consists basically of three lines of unreferenced text followed by three lengthy sections of links to Denman's films and other articles. Capitana (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I support deletion as the nominator Capitana (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to have had billed roles in the National Lampoon Dorm Daze series. Catchpole (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reply - I'm not disputing who the guy is but it doesn't seem anyone is interested in rectifying the reference situation. I am not really interested in the subject so there's little point in me trying to fix the article. I will remove the nomination if someone offers to fix the article up though. --Capitana (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep - Having had tags for a long time is not a valid reason for deletion. matt91486 (talk) 23:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. matt91486 (talk) 23:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.