The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tox[edit]

Tox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No claim of notability. Ignoring all the unreferenced statements about where his "tag" hsa been seen, we're left with a statement by the British police mentioning that Tox is a problem. Doesn't seem relevant for me. Montchav (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, non-notable, doesn't belong in an encyclopedia regardless. -RiverHockey (talk) 16:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. RMHED (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. And whilst you are at it, you might take a look at some of the other (many) nn graffiti artists on Wikipedia! Marcus22 (talk) 21:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good point, I was thinking the same thing. -RiverHockey (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.