The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TrashCon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about waste segregation technology that is commonplace throughout Europe and the US and I suspect many other countries. Nothing here that suggests any notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable and possibly written in a promotional tone. HarukaAmaranth ^春 _香 13:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 04:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The page creator and primary contributor to the article have been CU-blocked as socks. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 23:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The organization is “notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.” This article does not meet any of these criteria.Topjur01 (talk) 16:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.