The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't merge because no merge target has been identified. Sandstein 21:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trenithon[edit]

Trenithon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Cited only to "Ordnance Survey get-a-map SW8933055367" but WP:NGEO says "This guideline specifically excludes maps and census tables from consideration when establishing topic notability, because these sources often establish little except the existence of the subject." Reywas92^Talk 17:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 17:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 17:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- no evidence of notability.--Rusf10 (talk) 18:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge somewhere. I found books that show at some time, people were listed as being from Trenithon ([1], [2], [3]). A map shows there is a Trenithon Lane and the satellite images shows a farm and 2-3 houses. Not notable as a legally recognized populated place under GEOLAND#1, and not enough info for GNG or to develop an encyclopedic article. But since it is a historical place, there should be a mention/redirect to the article on the recognized populated place it's in. I'm just not sure what that is. It is near Summercourt, which is in St Enoder, but I don't know if it is correct to say Trenithon is within either. MB 02:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a former village according to this reliable source: "documentary analysis suggests that this farm was formerly a village split into several tenements owned by two different landowners in the 18th century", so passes WP:GEOLAND.----Pontificalibus 08:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The document only "suggests" it may have been a village, not that it actually was one, so there's no evidence that it was an officially recognised populated place. There once being a "John Whitehead Peard, of Trenithon, Esq." doesn't imply it was a village either. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As not notable, possibly unlikely, and not proven by sources. I am all for historical things but if we had a "WP:grasping at straws", it would apply. I looked at the sources, including the 3 provided above, as well as the "1699 Gascoyne Map of Cornwall". Although there seems to have been a "Trenithon Farm, St. Enoder, Cornwall", the reliable source states "...the documentary analysis suggests that this farm was formerly a village split into several tenements owned by two different landowners in the 18th century.". The word "suggests" does not give evidence of a village nor a "Populated places without legal recognition" per WP:GEOLAND, "in accordance with the GNG", which the subject fails. Otr500 (talk) 06:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.