The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle.gs[edit]

Triangle.gs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious advertising. All the sources are not verifiable and seem very opinionated. On top of that, article not suitable for Wikipedia. The huge community of the Minecraft game has much more important topics, and they are not covered here for obvious reasons. Cewlt (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.