The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tristam (DJ)[edit]

Tristam (DJ) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not nearly enough WP:RS for this youtube fame article. Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 20:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of the new references i listed was from a very reliable website, and it also contains much more information about Tristam, that i may add in the future. --User:Aidenscraft ^(Talk) 20:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I myself PRODed this and thede's nothing at all convincing of any applicable notability, current article has nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails NMUSIC 7 GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 02:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I'm guessing the "very reliable" source is the article in Tristam's local arts magazine The Vault. Struggling to see how he meets any of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. Richard3120 (talk) 04:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Article's creator is a single-purpose account that appears to be dedicated to promoting the subject. "Number of Youtube views" is not a reliable indicator of notability, and a single article in a local 'zine is insufficient. -- IamNotU (talk) 11:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.