The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as clearly nonsense. Theresa Knott | token threats 19:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed AfD heading. DARTH PANDA ^duel 21:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tubama[edit]

Unsourced, unverified. Looks like youthful mischief. Previously speedy deleted as nonsense, most recent speedy delete for same rationale was refused. Author's edit [1] history suggests vandalism as primary motive. JNW (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Speedy Delete candidate, per WP:IAR and WP:SNOW. A blissful fusion of non-notable neologism and random hoax, with poor writing drizzled on top to taste, and left to age in the barrel of ridiculous process wonkery. It tickles the brain with memories of middle school, while containing no content or potential for said content. A most splendidly useless, hopeless article that would only be improved with a light sprinkling of Salt, to prevent future recreation and/or fermentation. The fact that this was refused a merciful Speedy is exactly why people continue to take such liberal ("deletionist-friendly") positions with A1 and A3 - the dictionary definiton of "process wonkery" is Epbr123 (talk · contribs) demanding an article of this calibur be run through AfD Badger Drink (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a joke with no sources given and no sources to be found anywhere else. "Tubama" appears to be a word in Turkish and possibly other languages, but not with the meaning shown here. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G3) — complete and utter horse dung. MuZemike (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as vandalism, no reason to discuss it here, should have been tagged for speedy and deleted already.Theseeker4 (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. G3 does not apply, because it's not nonsensical - but it certainly looks like fodder for the Urban Dictionary. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.