The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - three short sentences. Not even an attempt at an article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two aspects of Statistical Consulting[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Umm... Contested PROD... WP:NOTESSAY? GMG ^talk 17:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - related topics (there are plenty already) may be fine but this is pure essay, and an abortive one at that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A10 of Methodological advisor and maybe something to do with Statistical consultancy process and Statistical Consulting’ aspects etc. Spam. Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, I'm not sure it's spam. It looks like it might be a student who hasn't figured out how we segment article topics yet. Didn't A10 myself because I couldn't think of anything it perfectly duplicated. GMG ^talk 19:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can't see the similarly titled articles deleted earlier today so I will defer to an admin on the motivations here. It's so short. I don't know, apparently WP:ACPERM will fix this issue. Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.