The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kind of WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

U.P. Centennial Year[edit]

U.P. Centennial Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was a university event that I am sure was notable within the University system but appears not to have been notable outside of it. References given consist strictly of primary sources. Article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable independent sources. I considered a redirect but could not find a basis on which to justify it. KDS4444 (talk) 22:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.