The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UTSL[edit]

UTSL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism that does not seem to have notable usage. The only references I can find to this are things like the jargon file defining the term, which does not seem sufficient for inclusion. Originally redirected to RTFM but there was no mention of this abbreviation there. Perhaps restore redirect and add mention of this initialism? Sjrct (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it has lasted three years? So not really a neologism perhaps, more like an "in joke". Still far from an encyclopedic topic. Probably not worth a redirect since unlikely would be a search term. W Nowicki (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.