The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete is the consensus. If someone wishes to wikitionary it fine, ping me and i'll provide the source Nja²⁴⁷ 08:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uberveillance[edit]

Uberveillance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism. Not a word. The barrage of references are the result of a campaign to try to popularize the word and get it voted by some organization as their Word of the Year. None of this makes "Uberveillance" actually a word, or notable. Tempshill (talk) 06:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom GainLine ♠ _♥ 09:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, ditto. The main difference between uberveillance (ubersurveillance) and sousveillance is the existentiality axis ... (Oh, that.) - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as neologism until it appears in the OED. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Put it in Wiktionary! - as the nominator said, 'uberveillance' is in the running for Word of the Year, but I have found places such as this article about microchips about uberveillance. Although it appears to be a word (even if it is a buzzword), Wikipedia is not a dictionary and I think this should be moved to Wiktionary. JulieSpaulding (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.