The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete - blatant hoax, G3. GiantSnowman 14:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um Bab FCF[edit]

Um Bab FCF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable club with no indication of verifiable sources via Google searches. After checking the Qatari Football Association's website, I couldn't find a reference to a third division or the club 'Um Bab'. Mephistophelian (talk) 20:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a hoax, and make sure to get the team member bios (all of which are currently prodded). There are a startling zero non-mirror Google hits for the team or any of its members, despite claims that some of them played for real teams (such as the claim that Mohammed Arfa Bezzina played for Qatar SC). Furthermore, the article claims that this club formerly played in the Qatari 4th division, and now in the Qatari 3rd division; Qatari football has but two divisions (the Qatari Stars League and Qatari 2nd Division). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the likely event that this is deleted, the processing admin may also want to nuke Mahmoudah Daouda, created by the same editor, and equally dubious. In the meantime, I've marked it for sticky prod. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. 02:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Yep. 100% hoax. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 13:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.