The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UniBall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and WP:V: non-notable game with no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, published sources. I've searched for sources using the WikiProject Video games guide to sources and also used the WPVG custom Google search, but I've only come up with forum posts. PC Zone Magazine is currently listed as a source; however, that was added by an IP with no other history of editing the article and a typed copy of the article by an admin on the UniBall forums reveals it to be both extremely trivial and unsupportive of any content or claims made in the article. Wyatt Riot (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Wyatt Riot (talk) 12:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I queried this game's notability one year ago, and there's been no improvement since then. Optionally Redirect to a "List of" article using the PC Zone issue for verification. Marasmusine (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I did find some other sources by Googling "uniball game", but they fail WP:SOURCES. --Veyneru (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.