The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 21:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Union Labour[edit]

Union Labour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. I don't even see mentions of this subject, never mind the RS which would be needed for notability. JMWt (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. JMWt (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Couldn't find any source for Union Labour. I even looked for old archived print sources, and nothing comes up. Fails WP:ORG. AmshitBalcon (talk) 19:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All sources I found were referring to the UK party of the same name, even documents that purported to be about Canada. It sounds like this was a breakout group that never achieved "real party" status. There may be info in archives, but that would be Original Research. Lamona (talk) 02:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Unsourced and forgotten OR from 2004. At best this was a short lived fringe group with nothing of LASTING impact in their history.  // Timothy :: talk  16:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.