The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge → University of Florida due to insufficient citation support to meet the WP:ORG threshold; all other matters cited by discussants are editorial issues. In the process of merging, offending material as mentioned and alluded to below should be excluded from the merger, but that is a purely editorial matter. The article is to be tagged with ((afd-mergeto|University of Florida|University of Florida Student Government|2008-04-19)) and the target article tagged with ((afd-mergefrom|University of Florida Student Government|University of Florida Student Government|2008-04-19)). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

University of Florida Student Government[edit]

Not notable local student government association. No independent reliable secondary sources. Makes no claim of notability. Original research throughout. SevernSevern (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. —Noetic Sage 18:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, violates WP:NOR, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:N. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back into the UF article. This stub fails WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:ORG, and also has a direct copy of the UFSG mission statement pasted from the SG website without quotations or proper citations and is screaming "COPYRIGHT VIOLATION!!!" - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 21:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to UF article, without prejudice to recreation if properly sourced and rewritten to eliminate peacock words, address NPOV issues, and (most importantly) avoid copyright infringement. With a $13 million yearly budget and a constituency of >50,000 students, notability of this organization can be clearly established, but the issues with this article ensure that this version is not acceptable. Horologium (talk) 02:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge very notable. Jccort (talk) 13:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —SevernSevern (talk) 04:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.