The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Keilana^talk_(recall) 01:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Utah Preparatory Academy[edit]

Utah Preparatory Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article is written like an advertisement (content appears to be directly from school's promotional materials) and does not assert topic's importance/notability. (Indeed, it doesn't even actually say that it's a school.) In a quick web search, I failed to find any evidence of notability. I don't think the school merits an article. If it does merit an article, a completely new article needs to be written. Orlady (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Orlady (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for deletion. The Boys Ranch is a subsidiary of the Academy. The article about the boys ranch has essentially the same issues (in fact, it has much of the same content) as the Academy article:

Utah Preparatory Academy Boys Ranch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

--Orlady (talk) 20:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I... fixed it up. In 5 minutes. You could have done that. Yeah, you. Keep. Fresheneesz (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• holy crap it's not a school after all-then what makes it notable, Fresheneesz? Wikipedia is not a directory of rehab joints. Delete as nonnotable. Chris (クリス) (talk) 03:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable rehab facility. Keep it civil everyone. --Smashville^BONK! 17:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 29 Google hits, out of which I couldn't find enough reliable, independent sources to create a neutral article out of. No Google News hits. No Google News Archives hits. If it could be shown that adequate sources are out there, I'd change my mind. Noroton (talk) 20:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. JERRY ^talk _contribs 15:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

NOTE The closing of the above AfD is incomplete. The second school co-nommed has not been dispositioned. A message has been left for the closing admin to remedy this. Before closing-out and archiving the associated log, please ensure this other school is properly dispositioned or relisted. The article still bears the AFD notice which references this discussion page. JERRY ^talk _contribs 05:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• closing for this AFD has been modified to delete both by the original closer. Second article has been deleted. JERRY ^talk _contribs 15:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]