The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I'm going to give PWilkinson the benefit of the doubt on this one but it would help if someone who reads Turkish can evaluate the Gnews sources he mentioned. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vakko[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional, nonenciclopedical text Esteban (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. --Lambiam 09:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. --Lambiam 09:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Beagel (talk) 14:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Except under certain restricted conditions, none of which seem to apply here, what counts at AfD is the notability of the subject of the article. In this case, I see hundreds of GNews hits, all in Turkish (which I don't read) but many of which are from major Turkish newspapers such as Habertürk, Hürriyet, Milliyet, Radikal and Sabah. Except in the very unlikely case that these are uniformly passing mentions, a Turkish speaker should easily be able to demonstrate notability for the subject. PWilkinson (talk) 16:42, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have created the lead, added a couple of references and did some copyediting. If I have time, I will try to re-write the article and to eliminate the promotional style, but generally it looks pretty much notable.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.